pd 1 Search Results


93
Miltenyi Biotec cd4 vit4 mouse igg2a
Cd4 Vit4 Mouse Igg2a, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd4 vit4 mouse igg2a/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd4 vit4 mouse igg2a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Leinco Technologies anti mouse pd 1
Anti Mouse Pd 1, supplied by Leinco Technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse pd 1/product/Leinco Technologies
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse pd 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ACROBiosystems human pd
Human Pd, supplied by ACROBiosystems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human pd/product/ACROBiosystems
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human pd - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ACROBiosystems biotinylated recombinant human pd l1
Biotinylated Recombinant Human Pd L1, supplied by ACROBiosystems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated recombinant human pd l1/product/ACROBiosystems
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated recombinant human pd l1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio X Cell nivolumab
Nivolumab, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nivolumab/product/Bio X Cell
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nivolumab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Bio X Cell anti pd 1
(A) UMAP visualization of major cell clusters identified from single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of NT2.5-LM breast-to-lung metastatic tumors after 3 weeks of treatment with: vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), <t>anti-CTLA-4</t> <t>+</t> <t>anti-PD-1</t> immune checkpoint inhibitors (PC), and Entinostat + anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 combination (EPC). Subclusters of MDSCs identified: G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs. (B) Iterative logistic regression analyses conducted on the major MDSC cluster comparing the Vehicle (V) and Entinostat + ICIs combination treatment (EPC). (C) Expression of Malat1 / MALAT1 in G- and M-MDSCs isolated from lung metastases of NT2.5-LM mice treated with vehicle vs. Entinostat for 3 weeks (left, n=2 from 5 pooled mice per treatment group), J774M murine MDSC-like cell line treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (middle, n=3), and human PBMC-derived MDSCs (hMDSCs) treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (right, n=3). (D) Median Fluorescence Intensity expression of Malat1 in CD45 + CD11b + MHC-II - F4/80 - Ly6G - Ly6C hi cells from lung metastases in 4T1 mice, treated with vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), and Entinostat + ICIs (EPC) for 3 weeks. (E) Expression of Malat1 in J774M cell line treated with various concentrations of various HDAC inhibitors, with corresponding targeted class and specific HDACs. One-way ANOVA for (C, E: all statistically significant with p<0.05, unless indicated as non-significant (ns)), Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for (D). * p<0.05, *** p< 0.001, **** p<0.0001. ENT = Entinostat; PAN = Panobinostat; BEL = Belinostat; VOR = Vorinostat; TSA = Trichostatin A; DOM = Domatinostat; CHL = Chlopynostat; PYR = Pyroxamide; SCA = Santacruzamate A; RGF = RGFP966; TMP = TMP269; SIS = SIS17.
Anti Pd 1, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pd 1/product/Bio X Cell
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti pd 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio X Cell cp151
(A) UMAP visualization of major cell clusters identified from single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of NT2.5-LM breast-to-lung metastatic tumors after 3 weeks of treatment with: vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), <t>anti-CTLA-4</t> <t>+</t> <t>anti-PD-1</t> immune checkpoint inhibitors (PC), and Entinostat + anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 combination (EPC). Subclusters of MDSCs identified: G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs. (B) Iterative logistic regression analyses conducted on the major MDSC cluster comparing the Vehicle (V) and Entinostat + ICIs combination treatment (EPC). (C) Expression of Malat1 / MALAT1 in G- and M-MDSCs isolated from lung metastases of NT2.5-LM mice treated with vehicle vs. Entinostat for 3 weeks (left, n=2 from 5 pooled mice per treatment group), J774M murine MDSC-like cell line treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (middle, n=3), and human PBMC-derived MDSCs (hMDSCs) treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (right, n=3). (D) Median Fluorescence Intensity expression of Malat1 in CD45 + CD11b + MHC-II - F4/80 - Ly6G - Ly6C hi cells from lung metastases in 4T1 mice, treated with vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), and Entinostat + ICIs (EPC) for 3 weeks. (E) Expression of Malat1 in J774M cell line treated with various concentrations of various HDAC inhibitors, with corresponding targeted class and specific HDACs. One-way ANOVA for (C, E: all statistically significant with p<0.05, unless indicated as non-significant (ns)), Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for (D). * p<0.05, *** p< 0.001, **** p<0.0001. ENT = Entinostat; PAN = Panobinostat; BEL = Belinostat; VOR = Vorinostat; TSA = Trichostatin A; DOM = Domatinostat; CHL = Chlopynostat; PYR = Pyroxamide; SCA = Santacruzamate A; RGF = RGFP966; TMP = TMP269; SIS = SIS17.
Cp151, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cp151/product/Bio X Cell
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cp151 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio X Cell anti cd47
(A) UMAP visualization of major cell clusters identified from single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of NT2.5-LM breast-to-lung metastatic tumors after 3 weeks of treatment with: vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), <t>anti-CTLA-4</t> <t>+</t> <t>anti-PD-1</t> immune checkpoint inhibitors (PC), and Entinostat + anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 combination (EPC). Subclusters of MDSCs identified: G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs. (B) Iterative logistic regression analyses conducted on the major MDSC cluster comparing the Vehicle (V) and Entinostat + ICIs combination treatment (EPC). (C) Expression of Malat1 / MALAT1 in G- and M-MDSCs isolated from lung metastases of NT2.5-LM mice treated with vehicle vs. Entinostat for 3 weeks (left, n=2 from 5 pooled mice per treatment group), J774M murine MDSC-like cell line treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (middle, n=3), and human PBMC-derived MDSCs (hMDSCs) treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (right, n=3). (D) Median Fluorescence Intensity expression of Malat1 in CD45 + CD11b + MHC-II - F4/80 - Ly6G - Ly6C hi cells from lung metastases in 4T1 mice, treated with vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), and Entinostat + ICIs (EPC) for 3 weeks. (E) Expression of Malat1 in J774M cell line treated with various concentrations of various HDAC inhibitors, with corresponding targeted class and specific HDACs. One-way ANOVA for (C, E: all statistically significant with p<0.05, unless indicated as non-significant (ns)), Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for (D). * p<0.05, *** p< 0.001, **** p<0.0001. ENT = Entinostat; PAN = Panobinostat; BEL = Belinostat; VOR = Vorinostat; TSA = Trichostatin A; DOM = Domatinostat; CHL = Chlopynostat; PYR = Pyroxamide; SCA = Santacruzamate A; RGF = RGFP966; TMP = TMP269; SIS = SIS17.
Anti Cd47, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd47/product/Bio X Cell
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd47 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio X Cell anti mouse pd 1 antibody
( A ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, and 19 days after inoculation. Omental tumor was collected on day 20 for analysis by flow cytometry. Groups included N = 5 mice. ( B ) Cell populations in tumor after treatment, displaying percentage of CD45 + cells made up by T cells (CD3 + ), CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, NK cells (CD3 - NK1.1 + ), B cells (CD19 + ), Macrophages (F4/80 + ), DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), and MDSCs (CD11b + Gr-1 hi ). Percentage of CD45 - cells made up by BPPNM cancer cells (GFP + ) are also displayed. ( C-D ) Polarization of Macrophages (F4/80 + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of ( C ) CD86 and ( D ) CD206. ( E ) Activation of DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of CD86. ( F ) Expression <t>of</t> <t>PD-1</t> on CD8 + T cells, showing percentage of cells that are PD-1 + and representative distributions of PD-1. P values computed with a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test are displayed above each figure. All flow data is represented as mean ± SD. ( G ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 days after inoculation. A subset of groups were additionally treated with 100 μg αPD-1 antibody at 11 and 17 days after inoculation. Groups included N = 6 (PBS, STING LNP, Scr LNP), N = 5 (STING LNP + αPD-1), or N = 4 (PBS + αPD-1, Scr LNP + αPD-1) mice. ( H ) Survival plot with P values determined by log(rank) (Mantel–Cox) test. ( I-K ) Tumor burden measured by IVIS, displaying ( I ) geometric mean ± SD bioluminescent intensity over the treatment period, ( J ) an image of the mouse with the median bioluminescent intensity from each group at the measurement following the end of treatment (day 24), and ( K ) individual mouse bioluminescent intensity values.
Anti Mouse Pd 1 Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse pd 1 antibody/product/Bio X Cell
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse pd 1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bio X Cell mouse cross reactive anti pd1
( A ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, and 19 days after inoculation. Omental tumor was collected on day 20 for analysis by flow cytometry. Groups included N = 5 mice. ( B ) Cell populations in tumor after treatment, displaying percentage of CD45 + cells made up by T cells (CD3 + ), CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, NK cells (CD3 - NK1.1 + ), B cells (CD19 + ), Macrophages (F4/80 + ), DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), and MDSCs (CD11b + Gr-1 hi ). Percentage of CD45 - cells made up by BPPNM cancer cells (GFP + ) are also displayed. ( C-D ) Polarization of Macrophages (F4/80 + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of ( C ) CD86 and ( D ) CD206. ( E ) Activation of DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of CD86. ( F ) Expression <t>of</t> <t>PD-1</t> on CD8 + T cells, showing percentage of cells that are PD-1 + and representative distributions of PD-1. P values computed with a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test are displayed above each figure. All flow data is represented as mean ± SD. ( G ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 days after inoculation. A subset of groups were additionally treated with 100 μg αPD-1 antibody at 11 and 17 days after inoculation. Groups included N = 6 (PBS, STING LNP, Scr LNP), N = 5 (STING LNP + αPD-1), or N = 4 (PBS + αPD-1, Scr LNP + αPD-1) mice. ( H ) Survival plot with P values determined by log(rank) (Mantel–Cox) test. ( I-K ) Tumor burden measured by IVIS, displaying ( I ) geometric mean ± SD bioluminescent intensity over the treatment period, ( J ) an image of the mouse with the median bioluminescent intensity from each group at the measurement following the end of treatment (day 24), and ( K ) individual mouse bioluminescent intensity values.
Mouse Cross Reactive Anti Pd1, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cross reactive anti pd1/product/Bio X Cell
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse cross reactive anti pd1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
R&D Systems pd
( A ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, and 19 days after inoculation. Omental tumor was collected on day 20 for analysis by flow cytometry. Groups included N = 5 mice. ( B ) Cell populations in tumor after treatment, displaying percentage of CD45 + cells made up by T cells (CD3 + ), CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, NK cells (CD3 - NK1.1 + ), B cells (CD19 + ), Macrophages (F4/80 + ), DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), and MDSCs (CD11b + Gr-1 hi ). Percentage of CD45 - cells made up by BPPNM cancer cells (GFP + ) are also displayed. ( C-D ) Polarization of Macrophages (F4/80 + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of ( C ) CD86 and ( D ) CD206. ( E ) Activation of DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of CD86. ( F ) Expression <t>of</t> <t>PD-1</t> on CD8 + T cells, showing percentage of cells that are PD-1 + and representative distributions of PD-1. P values computed with a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test are displayed above each figure. All flow data is represented as mean ± SD. ( G ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 days after inoculation. A subset of groups were additionally treated with 100 μg αPD-1 antibody at 11 and 17 days after inoculation. Groups included N = 6 (PBS, STING LNP, Scr LNP), N = 5 (STING LNP + αPD-1), or N = 4 (PBS + αPD-1, Scr LNP + αPD-1) mice. ( H ) Survival plot with P values determined by log(rank) (Mantel–Cox) test. ( I-K ) Tumor burden measured by IVIS, displaying ( I ) geometric mean ± SD bioluminescent intensity over the treatment period, ( J ) an image of the mouse with the median bioluminescent intensity from each group at the measurement following the end of treatment (day 24), and ( K ) individual mouse bioluminescent intensity values.
Pd, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pd/product/R&D Systems
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pd - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems mouse pd 1 fc
( A ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, and 19 days after inoculation. Omental tumor was collected on day 20 for analysis by flow cytometry. Groups included N = 5 mice. ( B ) Cell populations in tumor after treatment, displaying percentage of CD45 + cells made up by T cells (CD3 + ), CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, NK cells (CD3 - NK1.1 + ), B cells (CD19 + ), Macrophages (F4/80 + ), DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), and MDSCs (CD11b + Gr-1 hi ). Percentage of CD45 - cells made up by BPPNM cancer cells (GFP + ) are also displayed. ( C-D ) Polarization of Macrophages (F4/80 + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of ( C ) CD86 and ( D ) CD206. ( E ) Activation of DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of CD86. ( F ) Expression <t>of</t> <t>PD-1</t> on CD8 + T cells, showing percentage of cells that are PD-1 + and representative distributions of PD-1. P values computed with a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test are displayed above each figure. All flow data is represented as mean ± SD. ( G ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 days after inoculation. A subset of groups were additionally treated with 100 μg αPD-1 antibody at 11 and 17 days after inoculation. Groups included N = 6 (PBS, STING LNP, Scr LNP), N = 5 (STING LNP + αPD-1), or N = 4 (PBS + αPD-1, Scr LNP + αPD-1) mice. ( H ) Survival plot with P values determined by log(rank) (Mantel–Cox) test. ( I-K ) Tumor burden measured by IVIS, displaying ( I ) geometric mean ± SD bioluminescent intensity over the treatment period, ( J ) an image of the mouse with the median bioluminescent intensity from each group at the measurement following the end of treatment (day 24), and ( K ) individual mouse bioluminescent intensity values.
Mouse Pd 1 Fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse pd 1 fc/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse pd 1 fc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) UMAP visualization of major cell clusters identified from single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of NT2.5-LM breast-to-lung metastatic tumors after 3 weeks of treatment with: vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (PC), and Entinostat + anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 combination (EPC). Subclusters of MDSCs identified: G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs. (B) Iterative logistic regression analyses conducted on the major MDSC cluster comparing the Vehicle (V) and Entinostat + ICIs combination treatment (EPC). (C) Expression of Malat1 / MALAT1 in G- and M-MDSCs isolated from lung metastases of NT2.5-LM mice treated with vehicle vs. Entinostat for 3 weeks (left, n=2 from 5 pooled mice per treatment group), J774M murine MDSC-like cell line treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (middle, n=3), and human PBMC-derived MDSCs (hMDSCs) treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (right, n=3). (D) Median Fluorescence Intensity expression of Malat1 in CD45 + CD11b + MHC-II - F4/80 - Ly6G - Ly6C hi cells from lung metastases in 4T1 mice, treated with vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), and Entinostat + ICIs (EPC) for 3 weeks. (E) Expression of Malat1 in J774M cell line treated with various concentrations of various HDAC inhibitors, with corresponding targeted class and specific HDACs. One-way ANOVA for (C, E: all statistically significant with p<0.05, unless indicated as non-significant (ns)), Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for (D). * p<0.05, *** p< 0.001, **** p<0.0001. ENT = Entinostat; PAN = Panobinostat; BEL = Belinostat; VOR = Vorinostat; TSA = Trichostatin A; DOM = Domatinostat; CHL = Chlopynostat; PYR = Pyroxamide; SCA = Santacruzamate A; RGF = RGFP966; TMP = TMP269; SIS = SIS17.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A class act: HDAC1- Malat1 regulates MDSC apoptosis and cell cycling to decrease suppression of T cells

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.23.713743

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) UMAP visualization of major cell clusters identified from single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of NT2.5-LM breast-to-lung metastatic tumors after 3 weeks of treatment with: vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (PC), and Entinostat + anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1 combination (EPC). Subclusters of MDSCs identified: G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs. (B) Iterative logistic regression analyses conducted on the major MDSC cluster comparing the Vehicle (V) and Entinostat + ICIs combination treatment (EPC). (C) Expression of Malat1 / MALAT1 in G- and M-MDSCs isolated from lung metastases of NT2.5-LM mice treated with vehicle vs. Entinostat for 3 weeks (left, n=2 from 5 pooled mice per treatment group), J774M murine MDSC-like cell line treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (middle, n=3), and human PBMC-derived MDSCs (hMDSCs) treated with Entinostat for 24 hours (right, n=3). (D) Median Fluorescence Intensity expression of Malat1 in CD45 + CD11b + MHC-II - F4/80 - Ly6G - Ly6C hi cells from lung metastases in 4T1 mice, treated with vehicle (V), Entinostat (E), and Entinostat + ICIs (EPC) for 3 weeks. (E) Expression of Malat1 in J774M cell line treated with various concentrations of various HDAC inhibitors, with corresponding targeted class and specific HDACs. One-way ANOVA for (C, E: all statistically significant with p<0.05, unless indicated as non-significant (ns)), Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for (D). * p<0.05, *** p< 0.001, **** p<0.0001. ENT = Entinostat; PAN = Panobinostat; BEL = Belinostat; VOR = Vorinostat; TSA = Trichostatin A; DOM = Domatinostat; CHL = Chlopynostat; PYR = Pyroxamide; SCA = Santacruzamate A; RGF = RGFP966; TMP = TMP269; SIS = SIS17.

Article Snippet: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used in this study: anti-CTLA-4 (BioXCell cat. #BE0131) and anti-PD-1 (BioXCell cat. #BE0146).

Techniques: Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Isolation, Derivative Assay, Fluorescence

( A ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, and 19 days after inoculation. Omental tumor was collected on day 20 for analysis by flow cytometry. Groups included N = 5 mice. ( B ) Cell populations in tumor after treatment, displaying percentage of CD45 + cells made up by T cells (CD3 + ), CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, NK cells (CD3 - NK1.1 + ), B cells (CD19 + ), Macrophages (F4/80 + ), DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), and MDSCs (CD11b + Gr-1 hi ). Percentage of CD45 - cells made up by BPPNM cancer cells (GFP + ) are also displayed. ( C-D ) Polarization of Macrophages (F4/80 + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of ( C ) CD86 and ( D ) CD206. ( E ) Activation of DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of CD86. ( F ) Expression of PD-1 on CD8 + T cells, showing percentage of cells that are PD-1 + and representative distributions of PD-1. P values computed with a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test are displayed above each figure. All flow data is represented as mean ± SD. ( G ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 days after inoculation. A subset of groups were additionally treated with 100 μg αPD-1 antibody at 11 and 17 days after inoculation. Groups included N = 6 (PBS, STING LNP, Scr LNP), N = 5 (STING LNP + αPD-1), or N = 4 (PBS + αPD-1, Scr LNP + αPD-1) mice. ( H ) Survival plot with P values determined by log(rank) (Mantel–Cox) test. ( I-K ) Tumor burden measured by IVIS, displaying ( I ) geometric mean ± SD bioluminescent intensity over the treatment period, ( J ) an image of the mouse with the median bioluminescent intensity from each group at the measurement following the end of treatment (day 24), and ( K ) individual mouse bioluminescent intensity values.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A multivalent peptide-polymer conjugate material mimics STING to therapeutically activate innate immune signaling

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.24.712780

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, and 19 days after inoculation. Omental tumor was collected on day 20 for analysis by flow cytometry. Groups included N = 5 mice. ( B ) Cell populations in tumor after treatment, displaying percentage of CD45 + cells made up by T cells (CD3 + ), CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, NK cells (CD3 - NK1.1 + ), B cells (CD19 + ), Macrophages (F4/80 + ), DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), and MDSCs (CD11b + Gr-1 hi ). Percentage of CD45 - cells made up by BPPNM cancer cells (GFP + ) are also displayed. ( C-D ) Polarization of Macrophages (F4/80 + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of ( C ) CD86 and ( D ) CD206. ( E ) Activation of DCs (CD11c + MHCII + ), showing MFI and representative distributions of CD86. ( F ) Expression of PD-1 on CD8 + T cells, showing percentage of cells that are PD-1 + and representative distributions of PD-1. P values computed with a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test are displayed above each figure. All flow data is represented as mean ± SD. ( G ) Mice were inoculated with 3×10 6 BPPNM cells IP and dosed with 20 μg of STING or Scr conjugate delivered by LNP IP at 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 days after inoculation. A subset of groups were additionally treated with 100 μg αPD-1 antibody at 11 and 17 days after inoculation. Groups included N = 6 (PBS, STING LNP, Scr LNP), N = 5 (STING LNP + αPD-1), or N = 4 (PBS + αPD-1, Scr LNP + αPD-1) mice. ( H ) Survival plot with P values determined by log(rank) (Mantel–Cox) test. ( I-K ) Tumor burden measured by IVIS, displaying ( I ) geometric mean ± SD bioluminescent intensity over the treatment period, ( J ) an image of the mouse with the median bioluminescent intensity from each group at the measurement following the end of treatment (day 24), and ( K ) individual mouse bioluminescent intensity values.

Article Snippet: In groups specified in figure captions, mice were also administered a 100 μg dose of anti-mouse PD-1 antibody (Bio X Cell #BE0273 InVivoMAb, Clone 29F.1A12) in 200 μL of 1× PBS on days 11 and 17 after tumor inoculation.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Activation Assay, Expressing